User Tools

Site Tools


books:the_protocols_of_the_learned_elders_of_zion:introduction

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

books:the_protocols_of_the_learned_elders_of_zion:introduction [2020/05/02 18:19]
books:the_protocols_of_the_learned_elders_of_zion:introduction [2022/07/01 12:05] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Introduction ======
  
 +[[the_protocols_of_the_learned_elders_of_zion:the_protocols_of_the_learned_elders_of_zion|The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion]]
 +
 +<html>
 +<p>Of the <i>Protocols</i> themselves little need be said in the way
 +of introduction. The book in which they are embodied was first
 +published in the year 1897 by Philip Stepanov for private
 +circulation among his intimate friends. The first time Nilus
 +published them was in 1901 in a book called <i>The Great Within the Small</i> and
 +reprinted in 1905. A copy of this is in the British Museum bearing
 +the date of its reception, August 10, 1906. All copies that were
 +known to exist in Russia were destroyed in the Kerensky regime, and
 +under his successors the possession of a copy by anyone in Soviet
 +land was a crime sufficient to ensure the owner's of being shot on
 +sight. The fact is in itself sufficient proof of the genuineness of
 +the <i>Protocols</i>. The Jewish journals, of course, say that they
 +are a forgery, leaving it to be understood that Professor Nilus, who
 +embodied them in a work of his own, had concocted them for his
 +own purposes. </p>
 +<p>Mr. Henry Ford, in an interview published in the New York WORLD,
 +February 17th, 1921, put the case for Nilus tersely and convincingly
 +thus: </p>
 +<blockquote>
 +    <p>"The only statement I care to make about the PROTOCOLS
 +    is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen
 +    years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this
 +    time. THEY FIT IT NOW." </p>
 +</blockquote>
 +<p>Indeed they do! </p>
 +<p>The word <i>"Protocol"</i> signifies a precis gummed on
 +to the front of a document, a draft of a document, minutes of
 +proceedings. In this instance, <i>"Protocol"</i> means
 +minutes of the proceedings of the Meetings of the Learned Elders
 +of Zion. These <i>Protocols</i> give the substance of addresses
 +delivered to the innermost circle of the Rulers of Zion. They
 +reveal the converted plan of action of the Jewish Nation developed
 +through the ages and edited by the Elders themselves up to date.
 +Parts and summaries of the plan have been published from time to
 +time during the centuries as the secrets of the Elders have leaked
 +out. The claim of the Jews that the <i>Protocols</i> are forgeries
 +is in itself an admission of their genuineness, for they NEVER
 +ATTEMPT TO ANSWER THE FACTS corresponding to the THREATS which
 +the <i>Protocols</i> contain, and, indeed, the correspondence
 +between prophecy and fulfillment is too glaring to be set aside or
 +obscured. This the Jews well know and therefore evade. </p>
 +<p>Captain A.H.M. Ramsay records in his classic, <i>The Nameless War:</i> "According
 +to a letter published in "<i>Plain English"</i> (a weekly
 +review published by the North British Publishing Co. and edited by
 +the late Lord Alfred Douglas) on 3rd September, 1921:- </p>
 +<p>"The Learned Elders have been in existence for a much longer
 +period than they have perhaps suspected. My friend, Mr. L. D. van
 +Valckert, of Amsterdam, has recently sent me a letter containing two
 +extracts from the Synagogue at Mulheim. The volume in which they are
 +contained was lost at some period during the Napoleonic Wars, and
 +has recently come into Mr. van Valckert's possession. It is written
 +in German, and contains extracts of letters sent and received by the
 +authorities of the Mulheim Synagogue. The first entry he sends me is
 +of a letter received:- </p>
 +<p><i>16th June, 1647.</i> </p>
 +<p><i>From O.C. (i.e. Oliver Cromwell), by Ebenezer Pratt.</i> </p>
 +<p><i>"In return for financial support will advocate admission
 +of Jews to England: This however impossible while Charles living. </i></p>
 +<p><i>Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds for
 +which do not at present exist. Therefore advise that Charles be
 +assassinated, but will have nothing to do with arrangements for
 +procuring an assassin, though willing to help in his escape."</i> </p>
 +<p>In reply was dispatched the following:- </p>
 +<p><i>12th July, 1647.</i> </p>
 +<p><i>To O.C. by E. Pratt.</i> </p>
 +<p><i>"Will grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed and
 +Jews admitted. Assassination too dangerous. Charles shall be given
 +opportunity to escape: His recapture will make trial and execution
 +possible. The support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms
 +until trial commences."</i> </p>
 +<p>Captain Ramsay quotes Isaac Disraeli, father of Benjamin, Earl of
 +Beaconsfield, Britain's first Jewish Prime Minister, in his two
 +volume <i>"Life of Charles I",</i> published in 1851:
 +<i>"The English Revolution under Charles I was unlike any
 +preceding one . . . From that time and event we contemplate in our
 +history the phases of revolution."</i> There were many more to
 +follow on similar lines, notably in France. In 1897 a further
 +important clue to these mysterious happenings fell into Gentile hands
 +in the shape of the <i>Protocols of the Elders of Zion.</i></p>
 +<p>In that document we read this remarkable sentence:
 +<i>"Remember the French Revolution, the secrets of its
 +preparation are well known to us for it was entirely the work of our
 +hands."</i> (See Protocol No. III, XIV).
 +</p><p>In 1865 a certain Jewish Rabbi named Rzeichorn delivered a speech
 +at Prague. It is a very accurate summary of many aspects of the Protocols
 +which would come to light several decades later and was published
 +eleven years later by Sir John Radcliff, who was assassinated shortly
 +afterwards, giving testimony to the powers of the secret organisation
 +of inner elite Jewry even then.
 +</p><p>The presumption is strong that the <i>Protocols</i> were issued,
 +or reissued, at the First Zionist Congress held at Basle in 1897
 +under the presidency of the Father of Modern Zionism, the late
 +Theodore Herzl.
 +</p><p>There has been recently published a volume of Herzl's
 +"Diaries," a translation of some passages which
 +appeared in the JEWISH CHRONICLE of July 14, 1922. Herzl gives an
 +account of his first visit to England in 1895, and his
 +conversation with Colonel Goldsmid, a Jew brought up as a
 +Christian, an officer in the English Army, and at heart a Jew
 +Nationalist all the time. Goldsmid suggested to Herzl that the
 +best way of expropriating the English aristocracy, and so
 +destroying their power to protect the people of England against
 +Jew domination, was to put excessive taxes on the land. Herzl
 +thought this an excellent idea, and it is now to be found
 +definitely embodied in Protocol VI! </p>
 +<p>The above extract from Herzl's DIARY is an extremely significant
 +bit of evidence bearing on the existence of the Jew World Plot and
 +authenticity of the <i>Protocols,</i> but any reader of intelligence
 +will be able from his own knowledge of recent history and from his
 +own experience to confirm the genuineness of every line of them, and
 +it is in the light of this LIVING comment that all readers are
 +invited to study Mr. Marsden's translation of this terribly inhuman
 +document. </p>
 +<p> Here is what Dr. Ehrenpreis, Chief Rabbi of Sweden, said in 1924,
 +concerning the <i>Protocols</i>: "Long have I been well acquainted
 +with the contents of the <i>Protocols</i>, indeed for many years
 +before they were ever published in the Christian press. The Protocols
 +of the Elders of Zion were in point of fact not the original Protocols
 +at all, but a compressed extract of the same. Of the 70 Elders of
 +Zion, in the matter of origin and of the existence of the original
 +<i>Protocols,</i> there are only ten men in the entire world who know.</p>
 +<p>I participated with Dr. Herzl in the first Zionist Congress which
 +was held in Basle in 1897. Herzl was the most prominent figure at
 +the Jewish World Congress. Herzl foresaw, twenty years before we
 +experienced them, the revolution which brought the Great War, and
 +he prepared us for that which was to happen. He foresaw the splitting
 +up of Turkey, that England would obtain control of Palestine. We may
 +expect important developments in the world." </p>
 +<p>And here is another very significant circumstance.The present
 +successor of Herzl, as leader of the Zionist movement, Dr. Weizmann,
 +quoted one of these sayings at the send-off banquet given to Chief
 +Rabbi Hertz on October 6, 1920. The Chief Rabbi was on the point of
 +leaving for HIS Empire tour of H.R.H., the Prince of Wales. And this
 +is the "saying" of the Sages which Dr. Weizmann quoted:
 +<i>"A beneficent protection which God has instituted in the
 +life of the Jew is that He has dispersed him all over the world."</i>
 +(JEWISH GUARDIAN, Oct. 8, 1920.) </p>
 +<p>Now compare this with the last clause of but one of Protocol XI. </p>
 +<blockquote>
 +    <p>"God has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift of
 +    dispersion, and from this, which appears to all eyes to be our
 +    weakness, has come forth all our strength, which has now brought
 +    us to the threshold of sovereignty over all the world." </p>
 +</blockquote>
 +<p>The remarkable correspondence between these passages proves several
 +things. It proves that the Learned Elders exist. It proves that Dr.
 +Weizmann knows all about them. It proves that the desire for a
 +<i>"National Home"</i> in Palestine is only camouflage and
 +an infinitesimal part of the Jew's real object. It proves that the
 +Jews of the world have no intention of settling in Palestine or any
 +separate country, and that their annual prayer that they may all meet
 +<i>"Next Year in Jerusalem"</i> is merely a piece of their
 +characteristic make-believe. It also demonstrates that the Jews are
 +now a world menace, and that the Aryan races will have to domicile
 +them permanently out of Europe..</p></html>